Contracts audited
before deployment
Smart contracts with a Hardhat test suite above 90% coverage, a review pass against a written checklist, and gas modelled across four chains before you commit.
Deploying an unaudited contract to mainnet is the most expensive mistake in this category, and gas cost differences between chains are rarely modelled before the decision is locked in.
Smart contracts with a Hardhat test suite above 90% coverage, a review pass against a written checklist, and gas modelled across four chains before you commit.
What you get
- ERC-721 / ERC-1155 / ERC-20
- Hardhat test suite
- Security review pass
- Testnet deploy & verify
- Mint site + wallet connect
- IPFS metadata pinning
- Gas & chain cost modelling
- Deploy & operations runbook
| Starting from | $1,900 – $8,000 |
| Typical timeline | 1–8 weeks |
| Discipline | Frontier |
| Markets served | 8 countries |
| Ownership | 100% yours on payment |
| Support after launch | 30 days included |
Written response within 24 hours. No card required.
See it working
Not a screenshot — a live build you can click through right now, in your
own browser, before you pay us anything.
Blockchain & Web3 — questions answered
Which chains do you deploy to?
Ethereum, Polygon, Base and Arbitrum. We model the cost difference first — a contract deploy that costs $150 on Ethereum can be $0.10 on Polygon, and that should drive the decision.
Is this a formal audit?
No. We run a review pass against a written checklist — reentrancy, access control, overflow, gas. Above roughly $250k TVL we will tell you to commission a formal audit and refer you.
What is in the review checklist?
Reentrancy guards, access control on admin functions, supply cap enforced on-chain, immutable mint price, freezable metadata, no tx.origin auth, and withdraw using call rather than transfer.
Do you advise on tokenomics?
No. That is not our discipline and we will say so rather than improvise. We build and deploy; issuance strategy needs someone else.
What about the mint site?
Wallet connect, live supply counter, proper error states and mobile support. Most mint sites fail on error handling, not on the happy path.
